Friday, 12 August 2011

Shame on you, French Vogue

Time for another rant, and so soon after the last one! But it won't be as long. And it's not on the riots, either (still too depressed to rant about those).

Basically, has anyone seen this?

http://abcnews.go.com/Health/w_MindBodyResource/10-year-models-grown-high-fashion-high-risk/story?id=14221160

Does it make me a wishy-washy, hand-wringing liberal to express my dismay and borderline disgust at this photo shoot, which appeared in the Tom Ford-edited January issue of French Vogue? I hope not. I have to agree with Chloe Angyal - this isn't 'art' it's just plain creepy. And even if they were just trying to make some sort of edgy, provocative, 'subversive', thought-provoking statement about the sexualisation and fetishization of young girls in the fashion industry, I really don't think sexualising and fetishizing a 10 year old girl is the way to go, no matter how up for it she and her mother seem to be (and by the way, said mother has since defended the shoot, saying, "The only thing that shocks me about the photo is the necklace that she's wearing, which is worth 3 million Euros." Fantastic.). 

Look at the photos. Look at them. Tell me you don't want to pour bleach into your eyes, especially if, like me, your first reaction was something along the lines of "Wow, she's hot! Oh wait, she's TEN?! Shit. Can I just mention that I am not a paedophile?"




Aaaarrrrrgh!

Why can't we have pictures of young girls reading Enid Blyton books and climbing trees and playing badminton in the garden and drinking lemonade in magazines, instead of sultry come-hither stares, parted lips and high heels?? It pains me to think that a photoshoot of this nature might now actually be a shocking, ground-breaking, game-changer. In my opinion, the only vaguely come-hither look a 10 year old should be giving, if any, is to a 99 Flake draped seductively in raspberry sauce on a hot summer day. I feel like how the hobbits must've felt as they traipsed through Middle-Earth through the clouds of smoke and the senseless killings. Is there no GOOD and INNOCENCE left in the world, Mr Frodo?? Must... look at... pictures of Hobbiton.


Ahh, that's better. When Sam was stuck on a rock with Frodo as the world was collapsing into ash and flames all around them, he wasn't thinking of 10 year old Thylane Lena-Rose Blondeau draped seductively on a tiger skin in 6 inch leopard print stilettos, he was thinking of (a significantly older) Rosie Cotton dancing, with ribbons in her hair.

Sometimes I wish I were a Hobbit.

Thursday, 4 August 2011

A rant about 'rape'

Earlier today I posted a status update on the Book of Face which was a mini rant about being shoved on the train during my commute to work. It was quite amusing really. This small, Chinese lady dressed all in pink battery-rammed me out of the way with her stupidly large pink handbag, and all because the girls in front of me didn’t move into the carriage fast enough. (Dawdlers are a common source of rage to me in this city, but it’s fun ‘cos I get to mine the comic potential from the rage that festers deep within my soul.) Anyway, a friend then replied saying that being at Admiralty station during rush hour is how they ‘imagine it feels to be gang-raped’.

My response was something along the lines of: o.0

We then exchanged a couple of additional comments where he apologised for going too far and I apologised for my sense of humour fail. No hard feelings, and all was well again. But it got me thinking. This isn’t the first time I’ve felt uncomfortable or even disapproved of a male (and I've found it usually is a male, not a female) using the word ‘rape’ in an unexpected context. You know, like, “I got totally ass-raped at work today”. Mostly though, I’ve noticed, it comes up in relation to gaming. A synonym could perhaps be ‘owned’, or ‘pwned’, or ‘destroyed’.

I guess the main point of this post is to help me unpick just why this bothers me so much. Firstly, ‘rape’ is one of those words which kinda gives me the heebie jeebies. The connotations for me (arising from its actual, primary meaning) are fear, horror, pity, revulsion. So first, what is rape? Without looking up a formal definition, I would probably say that rape is primarily a form of sexualised violence. It happens to both men and women but I don’t think I need to look up any statistics to back up the assumption that it happens mostly to women. It is not only a sexual act but an act of power, of dominance, of subjugation, of humiliation. Besides murder and child abuse, it is also theft of the most invasive, psychologically damaging kind. The rapist takes what he or she wants from their victim, and then leaves. If someone breaks into your house and steals your shit, you might feel sad, angry, shaken up, scared. But eventually you move on. You install some new locks. You grieve the old shit. You possibly buy new shit to replace the old shit. But rape? God forbid, but if it were ever to happen to me, then it might take me a lifetime re-learning how to ever trust another human being again.

There are other forms of horrendous violence and violent acts committed by those with power against those who have little, or none. But we don’t hear those appropriated for the sake of jokey lad banter. People don’t go around saying, “Aw man, did you see that? I got totally gas-chambered.” Or, “Dude, that was the worst exam I’ve ever done, it molested the child out of me.” Or, “Shit man, you fucking KKK’d my black ass.”

And maybe that’s why it pisses me off so much. Because for a guy to use the word ‘rape’ in a stupid, jokey, gaming context, whether that’s in reference to football or Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 or whatever (which is a GAME and therefore in the realm of FANTASY and therefore NOT REAL) is like me wandering into Bangladesh during the middle of a famine complaining about how I was totally FOIE-GRAS’ED in First Class on the plane journey on the way there. “Oh God, yeah, the food just kept coming, it was MENTAL. How many courses was it? 4? No, it was 5, or 8 if you include all the littleamuse bouches… and the champagne! There were positively rivers of it, seriously. Oh my GOD I think I need to undo my trousers, I’m not sure I can ever eat again. If someone were to put a gun to my head right now and tell me that if I didn’t eat a plate of steak or roast dinner or my mum’s lamb biriyani or whatever I think I’d just ask them to shoot me.”

What a wanker! :P But yeah, it’s that kind of nonsensical, ridiculous, insensitive, knobby ignorance of privilege – the boys who talk flippantly about ‘being raped’ probably don’t spend a lot of time thinking or worrying about being actually raped in real life, just as both the fictional, obnoxious version, and the real version of me don’t spend a lot of time thinking or worrying about how famine would affect me in real life. I’m privileged enough not to have to worry about it, but that doesn’t mean I shouldn’t. Real people do suffer from famine. And real people get raped.

These jokey-lad-banter-boys probably don’t wonder whether they should pop that rape alarm their dad gave them in their pocket before they go on a night out in case they need it on the way home, or worry about what randoms might try to approach them or follow them or harass them as they try to walk down the street, wishing that they could disappear into themselves or somehow become invisible. I feel my heart rate rise every time I see an Indian man in the street, or in a shop, or in a bar, because I don’t want to have to deal with their unwanted stares, or whistles, or leery hellos, or feeble attempts to make conversation, or thinly-veiled attempts to connect with ‘another fellow Asian’. Mostly because I can’t be arsed with the annoyance, but a lot because I’ve had so many bad experiences before that it just becomes utterly disheartening and demoralising to have these encounters, however brief, with these men who give you every signal imaginable to indicate that you are merely there, that you exist, purely for their diversion/enjoyment/pleasure, and that whether you actually want their attention or not is completely irrelevant, because you are a woman, and your job is to look pretty and make them happy and do what they want you to do, and you could not possibly have thoughts or feelings or opinions of your own that do not align with that narrow, pathetic world-view. Or if you do, they just don’t give a fuck. You say no, you say you’re not interested, you say you already have a boyfriend, you even say ‘Look, you are making me feel very uncomfortable,’ but the advances still keep coming. Because secretly the answer is yes, they just have to be patient enough for you to say it. Newsflash, morons: the answer is always, and will always be, no. But every time you keep asking you demean me and belittle me and ruin my day/evening/night. So thanks for that.

And for anyone who is thinking at this point (and I genuinely hope no-one reading this does) that I ought to ‘loosen up’ and ‘get a sense of humour’ I’d kindly request you punch yourself in the face so I don’t have to. Go join those Indian men in the corner, I’m sure you’ll get on handsomely (or greasily, rather).

Wow, that became a completely different rant! Or did it…?

Oh dear. I did not intend this to be a man-hating rant. Nor am I pointing fingers at those jokey-bantery-boys… well, I am a bit, but not in a jabby eye-stabby sort of way. I’m sure many of my male friends, who I love and respect, are guilty of questionable rape similes just as much as I and some of my girl friends are guilty of questionable gay similes (e.g. “Twilight is so gay” i.e. lame). I do that. But I guess the point is I/we should know better.


Wednesday, 27 July 2011

Cher Lloyd - New Single

So Cher Lloyd, the outspoken teen ‘gangsta’ from last year’s X-Factor who pretty much polarised viewer opinion, has finally released her first single under the monolithic and possibly evil “Simco Limited” label. If I said I’d been waiting anxiously with bated breath to see how little Cher would reinvigorate the British teen music scene with her cool rapping and fresh hip hop flava, I’d be lying. I haven’t. And I didn’t have any particularly strong opinions on her during X-Factor either. But here it is:


First impressions? Oh dear. It’s a desperately narcissistic and, frankly, embarrassing offering.

“You can't stop clickin 'bout me, writin' 'bout me, tweeting 'bout me,” she insists, swagerringly, à la Gwen Stefani in “Hollaback Girl” or Fergie in “Fergalicious”, with a smidgen of ‘I really want to be Nicki Minaj’; then later, with supreme self-assurance she further insists, “You can't stop youtubing me, on repeat, running this beat.” Erm… I haven’t even started, luv, let alone stop.

And then there’s the awful sampling of the American western folk ballad “Oh My Darling Clementine.” (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nzCSTMWix3g) Who came up with that gem of an idea?

Another ‘why’ is her hair. She looks like she suddenly decided that her new style icon was going to be Chewbacca. Look! They could practically be style sisters:






And then there’s the title: “Swagger Jagger”. What does that even mean? IT MAKES NO SENSE. It seems that Urban Dictionary have got it right with their definition: http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=swagger%20jagger

To conclude, I did not have particularly strong opinions on Ms Lloyd before, but I can’t help but come out there and say, with supreme self-assurance, that I think this single is pants.

Your thoughts?

Monday, 13 December 2010

x-rated factor total smackdown: rihanna vs christina aguilera

Ah, another year, another X Factor winner. But am I the only one still reeling from the complete flesh fest that was Saturday's semi-finals? May not have been the only semi in evidence given all the brazen nakedness and blatant bum wiggling on show.

The fun and games began with Matt's celebrity duet. I was snorting into my G&T as he resorted to gnawing off his own hand when Rihanna came on stage. I don't blame him though, poor chap, he was probably ruminating on how terribly embarassing it would be to get too visibly excited on live television in front of 15 million people.


I don't think it's possible for a slit to get any higher, is it?

And then Christina Aguilera and Rebecca's duet... bloody hell. Poor, poor Rebecca. Throughout, Christina's round face exhibited little more than bored disdain. She warbled and showboated her way through it with all the grace and enthusiasm of... hmm... my parents, back in the day, when I insisted they dragged themselves out of bed at 7am on a Saturday morning to take me to a hockey match in the freezing cold. A sort of stony-faced martyrdom, punctuated by the weary sigh of obligation.

If a thought bubble were to have somehow magically appeared over her head as she stalked her way unsmiling off the stage, it may have said something like this: "Oh God, look at what my life has become. I used to be big, man, so big. I was bigger than Britney! Now I just have a big face, and even bigger boobs. And here I am singing with this provincial, unintelligible nobody on some crappy reality TV show. I better start taking some more clothes off, eh."

That she did, but not before Rihanna, who cast aside a slinky floor-length dressing gown to reveal an outift consisting solely of a strapless bra and a pair of pants:



My eyes! Nice booty though, Rihanna, I ain't gonna argue with that.

Not to be outdone by any young upstart, however, Christina returned to stake her claim on the realm of unashamed sluttiness with this number from her new film Burlesque:



Bloody 'ell. Those dancers didn't leave much to the imagination, and what is it with all the mad hair flinging?? I'm not a prude, but it did all seem a bit unneccessary for Saturday night pre-watershed telly. It's also a sad state of affairs that someone with such a stonking vocal talent as Christina Aguilera feels like she has to resort to getting her jubblies out on national television to justify her ongoing career. And is that tactic really working anyway? I don't really remember her latest album, Bionic, ever being released... do you? Here's one of the two singles, 'Not Myself Tonight', which features Xtina in skintight PVC, complete with weaponised stiletto heels and whip:



Hmm. Anyways, I guess, if nothing else, Saturday's skin spectacle may have given all those dutiful, self-sacrificing boyfriends and husbands (and mebbe some girlfriends and wives) a little something to enjoy.

Wednesday, 27 October 2010

The Event: a bit of a non event?

Did anyone else watch "The Event" last week on Channel 4? It's a "new high-octane US thriller" which is being advertised as a cross between 24 and Lost. You can tell it's high-octane by the promotional pictures:


The cast's constipated, industrial-fan-blown faces and their weird faux running man arms clearly indicate that there is something of Great Import occuring. (And possibly in more than one direction given the way everyone is looking.)

But I couldn't help but feel massively underwhelmed by the whole thing. For one, it's not helped by its slightly wanky, nondescript title. Yes, I know its meant to inspire curiosity and an avid episode-devouring desire to find out just what the hell is going on, but it's difficult to dredge up enough energy to care when everything feels so reminiscent of its predecessors that there is precious little that is new or original to grab onto.

Let's see. We have the strong, honest, black president who's desperate to blow a Conspiracy wide open and generally Do The Right Thing; he in turn is antagonised by beady-eyed shifty-looking bald men in his office who are equally keen to keep things from him (hello 24). Then there's a plane full of people which is about to crash but then disappears and ends up crashing into a location quite different to and a ways away from where it was meant to. There is also a focus on introducing individual characters and filling in their backstory bit by bit with disjointed flashback sequences (hello Lost).

You have this man who looks disconcertingly like Ethan Hawke:


This woman (she was in E.R.), the leader of a group of people locked away in a Guantanamo-Bay-like secret facility in Alaska, who reminds me of Battlestar Galactica's Laura Roslin:


And Ethan Hawke's girlfriend, who sort of reminds me of the pregnant Australian girl in Lost:


The font used to introduce said characters and flashbacks looks extremely like the 24 font. It may even be the same one. The intros float up and out towards the viewer with intention. But 24 had cinematic visual flair, a breakneck pace and Kiefer fucking Sutherland. I'll always remember how my heart used to go at the split screens, Jack Bauer growling 'dammit!' and the infernal CLOCK! As for Lost, I never really got into it, but from what little I've seen the characters seemed to be one of the biggest draws, and of course that, intertwined with the mysteries of The Island made for one compelling little package.

Perhaps I'm being unfair to The Event by continually comparing it to other things, but when it so noticeably invites the comparisons its hard not to. I just wish it did a bit more to differentiate itself.


Tuesday, 26 October 2010

A new blog for November!

Dear readers (all 4 or 5 of you... :P), next month I will be embarking upon a South American adventure. No doubt I shall be drinking, eating, and indeed roistering all day there too, but I have begun a new journal specifically to document the trip in all its meaty glory. You can find it here.

Monday, 20 September 2010

Captain Northern Quarter

Last week I spent a few days visiting my good friend Paula, who lives in central Manchester. We were both a little bemused to come back to her flat to find that various men, besuited in bright yellow jackets, were busily attaching shopfronts onto the disused warehouse building opposite. Turns out she's currently living on a film set, because Hollywood has descended upon the Northern Quarter. The film in question: Captain America: the First Avenger, starring Chris Evans, Samuel L Jackson, Tommy Lee Jones and Hugo Weaving. Marvel-lous!

Apparently the Northern Quarter was chosen because "its wide streets, towering buildings and pre-war architecture make the perfect backdrop for 1940s New York." As of today, filming has begun, and there will be a carchase sequence plus explosions. The film crew will be in town for about three weeks before moving on to shoot some more scenes in the Liverpool docks. Obviously, this being me, I took some photos innit:









For rent: LES. Ooh-er. I hope Les knows what he's in for.




A lot les(s) saucy. You got off this time, Les.


I'd be a bit miffed if I were Paula though, cos they just started building this set on her road without really telling anyone, which seems a little unfair. There are at least 2 big blocks of flats on that road, which are not being New Yorkified in any way, and which are full of non-fictional 2010 Manchester folk, and now they're closing off the road, so she and everyone else will probably have to be relegated to entering and leaving through the basement car park via some longwinded circuitous route, like shady criminals. Bit of an arse. Least they could have done was give some advance notice, rather than be like, oh by the way, you can't come into your flat today, we're exploding things. Pfft. Hollywood. Oh well. I hope she gets an autograph at least! :D

[edit: more photos here -->